Matched by Ally Condie

 


Warning: This review may contain some spoilers to the book.

Imagine living in a world where everything is decided for you. Some of these life changing decisions involve when you learn how to read, write, take on responsibility, obtain a vocation, who you marry, and when you die. To decide these life changing decisions, this society would use data and percentages from your previous actions to calculate the possibilities of future actions. As a result of this society being very calculated, it would strive to have equality. For example, if someone had a special object, but a friend didn’t, the officials would take all the special items away, because it fostered inequality. Imagine living in this controlling society where everything was neutral and predicted based on previous actions that were compiled in data.

Matched is a dystopian novel, written by Ally Condie, about a teenage girl named Cassia living in a community as described above. Cassia, along with many others, looked forward to her Matching Banquet which was when she would be assigned to her perfect match, Xander. She had no doubt that Xander, a childhood friend, was her ideal mate. However, when she got home to look at Xander's information on a tablet the officials provided to her, a different face appeared on the screen and then the screen went black. Cassia was shocked because the face that appeared was another childhood friend that she knew, Ky. She was now stuck in a choice between two matches that ultimately became a choice between perfection or passion.

My Review on Matched

Overall, I thought this book was very predictable and had a slow plot. The plot was not entirely foreign to me because I have read many basic romance novels where this situation was presented, and the main character usually chooses passion over perfection. As a result, I found many of the main character's actions predictable and obvious. Another problem I encountered was it didn't have a monumental climax. This could be a result of the author's writing style; however, I felt that the events leading up to the climax were slow and, when I realized that the climax had started, I had already lost interest in the story. Although, I enjoyed the dystopian aspects of the novel, at times I felt that the author included too many dystopian aspects which became annoying. Some of the dystopian aspects in the book were a red, blue, and green pill that have unordinary affects, only keeping a record of 100 poems from history before the society began, having futuristic technology that made life easier on individuals, and constant surveillance of the society. In conclusion, I wouldn't recommend this book to people unless they like an uneventful reading book and are willing to read a slow plot.

Comments

  1. I really liked this review! Although you didn't really like the book you explained it very well and did a great job depicting its disadvantages and advantages. I agree that slow books without a monumental climax aren't the best. Good job:)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Another good blog post. You gave your opinion about the book, which changed my mind about how you described it. I would think such a story would work great, but if you say that it is uneventful and doesn't have a monumental climax, that is something I wouldn't have known without your opinion, and otherwise something I would have discovered on my own if I were to read it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Great review! I've also read matched, and like you, did not really enjoy it. I agree with all your points, and I like that you were honest with your review. I also do not like book with dragging slow plots.

    ReplyDelete
  4. A world all equal and a decision of one. I could not imagine living in a neutral world where everything is sorted to fit one's life to not create disruption. The girl had to pick between her two friends, and as you said, it was very predictable. Though, the environment and the story seems to make this a pretty good book. I'll check out if I'm feeling happy because of a world so equal and a decision that's impassable.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I read this book a while ago, and I agree with most of what you said. I do think you hated the book a little more than I did, but you make some very good points. What made me like it was really the setting and dystopian features, which you did mention, and not really the characters and plot as they are pretty slow and predictable. I guess setting is more important to me than the rest of it, which you seem to disagree with. Anyway, great post and I love seeing other peoples perspectives on books!
    -Claire Hobson

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment